NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Sasterawan v Morris [2008] NSWCA 70
HEARING DATE(S): 5 March 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Tobias JA at 2; McClellan CJ at CL at 104
(a) That District Court Proceedings No. 05/22/0149 in the Matter of the Appeal of Wahyu Sasterawan be removed into the Court of Appeal; (b) That the orders made by Nicholson DCJ in the said proceedings on 7 September 2005 be quashed; DECISION: (c) That the said proceedings be remitted to the District Court for rehearing; (d) That the costs of the hearing before the Local Court and Nicholson DCJ be reserved for determination on the remitted hearing of the appeal; (e) That the first opponent pay the claimant's costs of the second amended summons filed in this Court on 5 December 2007.
CATCHWORDS: Certiorari – Application pursuant to s 69 Supreme Court Act 1970 – Common law duty to give reasons for decision – Whether failure to give reasons error of law – Whether failure to give reasons jurisdictional error – Whether party could request primary judge to amend or supplement reasons prior to entry of judgment – Whether primary judge failed to find essential element of charge proven – Whether primary judge misstated burden of proof – Whether Court should exercise discretion to grant relief in nature of certiorari – Considerations for exercise of discretion to grant relief – Whether errors of law should have been submitted as questions of law in case stated from District Court pursuant to s 5B Criminal Appeal Act 1912.
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 178BB Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) s 11, s 20 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5B Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 46, s 69 Supreme Court Rules (NSW) Pt 51 r 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate