NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jessica Estates v Lennard [2007] NSWSC 1434
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 November and 6 December 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expedition List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
DECISION : Mandatory injunction granted.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY – Land under Torrens system – Interests in land – Restrictive covenant – enforcement – remedies – mandatory injunction – whether damages a sufficient remedy – whether injury to plaintiffs' rights slight – whether compensable by damages – where defendants proceed to construct after warnings – where defendants aware that risk involved - EQUITY – Remedies – Injunctions – mandatory injunctions – to enforce negative covenant – discretion – whether damages a sufficient remedy – defences – laches – where defendants did not and could not reasonably have inferred acquiescence – hardship – where defendants proceeded on legal advice subsequently shown to be erroneous – where defendants aware that issue was debatable
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, s 28 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 28.2
Baxter v Four Oaks Properties Ltd [1965] Ch 816 Bowes v Law (1870) LR 9 Eq 636 Boyns v Lackey (1958) 58 SR (NSW) 395 Carpet Import Co Ltd v Beath & Co Ltd [1927] NZLR 37 Collum v Opie (2000) 76 SASR 588 Cowper v Laidler [1903] 2 Ch 337 Gafford v Graham [1999] 3 EGLR 75 Harrison v Good (1871) LR 11 Eq 338 Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269 Jessica Estates v Lennard [2007] NSWSC 1175 Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co (of Great Britain and Ireland) Ltd [1957] 2 QB 334 Krehl v Burrell (1878) 7 Ch D 551, 554; affirmed (1879) 11 Ch D 146, 148; Lamshed v Lamshed (1963) 109 CLR 440 Leader v Moody (1875) LR 20 Eq 145 Leeds Industrial Cooperative Society Ltd v Slack [1924] AC 851 Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221 CASES CITED : Middleton v Arthur [2002] NSWSC 627 Mortimer v Bailey [2005] 2 BLR 85 Murphy v Hudson (1995) 6 BPR 14,061 Nelson v Rye [1996] 2 All ER 186 Owen v O'Connor [1964] NSWR 1312 Post Investments Pty Ltd v Wilson (1990) 26 NSWLR 598 Price v Hilditch [1930] 1 Ch 500 Sefton v Tophams [1965] Ch 1140, 1169ff (Stamp J)]. Sharp v Harrison [1922] 1 Ch 502 Shelfer v City of London Electrical Lighting Company [1895] 1 Ch 287 Smith v Smith (1875) LR 20 Eq 500 Trewin v Felton [2007] NSWSC 851 Wakeham v Wood (1982) 43 P&CR 40 Watson v Commercial Bank of Aust (1879) 5 VLR (<) 36 Wood v Conway Corporation [1914] 2 Ch 47 Woollerton & Wilson Ltd v Richard Costain Ltd [1970] 1 All ER 483 Meagher, Gummow & Lehane, Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, 3rd edn, [3601]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate