NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2008) NSW Conv R 56-203
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : LUXFORD & ANOR v SIDHU & 3 ORS [2007] NSWSC 1356
HEARING DATE(S) : 12-15/11/2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 December 2007
JURISDICTION : EQUITY
JUDGMENT OF : Bryson AJ at 1
CATCHWORDS : VENDOR AND PURCHASER - vendors sue for damages and for deposit after purchaser fails to complete - purchaser's failure to complete arose from (1) discovery after exchange of SEPP53 providing for likely medium-density development of neighbouring property (but not of property sold) (2) discovery that agent misrepresented existence of rival purchaser and called for immediate exchange - purchaser cross-claims damages for fraudulent misrepresentation by agent about interest of supposed other prospective purchaser factual disputes between vendor and agent about responsibility for misrepresentation - on valuation evidence the property's value was equal to the sale price, hence no damages, cross-claimed failed and damages awarded to vendors for failure to complete - vendors' alternate claim against agent, purchaser's claim against her solicitor also dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Local Government Act
Colin Robert Luxford and Ann Mary Luxford - Plaintiffs Evelyn Perpetual Sidhu - First Defendant PARTIES : PA & NA Johnson Pty Ltd - Second Defendant Johnson Prestige Realty Pty Ltd - Third Defendant David Michael Johnson - Fourth Defendant Peter Michael McBride and Anna Maria Bernadette Marano - Cross Defendants
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6058/2005
G.C. Lindsay SC and G. Lucarelli - Plaintiff COUNSEL : D.E. Grieve QC and T. Lynch - First Defendant R. Sheldon - Second, Third and Fourth Defendants I.R. Pike - Cross-defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate