NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 66 ACSR 398
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Martin John Green in his capacity as liquidator of Arimco Mining Pty Limited (in liquidation) v CGU Insurance Limited & Ors [2008] NSWSC 825
HEARING DATE(S) : 14/07/08-18/70/08, 21/07/08-24/07/08, 28/07/08, 4/08/08-5/08/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 August 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Parties to bring in short minutes of order.
CATCHWORDS : Insurance - Insurance Contracts Act - Directors and Officers liability - Insolvent trading claim under section 588 M Corporations Law brought by the plaintiff in his capacity as liquidator - Section 6 (4) Law Reform Miscellaneous Provisions) Act - Non-disclosure /misrepresentation - Relevant test that of the reasonable insured not the prudent insurer - Knowledge requires considerably more than "suspicion" or "belief" - Matter must be known to insured at the time to be a matter relevant and known to insured or a reasonable person to be relevant to the decision of insurer whether to accept the risk and if so on what terms - Legislative history of sections 21 and 28 of Insurance Contracts Act - Dangers posed by litigation proceeding through benefit of hindsight - Finding that had proper disclosure been made insurer would not have issued a policy without an insolvency exclusion - Terms of settlement reached by liquidator with directors of directors agreed to entry of judgment against each of them in the amount of $15,000,000, liquidator agreeing to receive far smaller amounts from directors presently - Terms of settlement include agreement by liquidator to discharge judgment if either the (1) proceedings terminate in favour of the liquidator or (2) liquidator reaches a compromise of the proceedings against insurer or (3) proceedings terminate in favour of the insurer - Finding that liquidator contracted for the entry of judgment but relevantly agreed not to enforce the judgment and agreed to discharge it in any event - Liquidator alleged to have approbated and reprobated - Section 588G (2) (b) of Corporations Law - Reasonable grounds for suspicion of insolvency - Belief in insolvency on the grounds of balance of probabilities not the test
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate