NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 9) [2007] NSWSC 84
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 January 2007, 31 January 2007, 5 February 2007, 6 February 2007, 7 February 2007, 8 February 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
DECISION : The application to exclude the evidence of Richard Llewellyn Morgan under s.138 Evidence Act 1995 is refused.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - application under s.138 Evidence Act 1995 to exclude entirety of evidence of Crown witness - Accused contends that evidence improperly obtained - contention that police investigators acted improperly in circumstances where witness gives induced statement and receives use derivative use undertaking under s.9(6) Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) - no impropriety established - application refused
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth)
R v Petroulias (No. 6) [2006] NSWSC 1422 R v Petroulias (No. 8) [2007] NSWSC 82 R v Petroulias (No. 1) [2006] NSWSC 788 Robinson v Woolworths Limited (2005) 64 NSWLR 612 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19 CASES CITED : Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Ho (1998) 102 A Crim R 37 Rozenes v Beljajev [1995] 1 VR 53 Rozenes v His Honour Judge Kelly [1996] 1 VR 320 Ganin v NSW Crime Commission (1993) 32 NSWLR 423 Registrar, Court of Appeal v Craven (1994) 77 A Crim R 410 Rogan v Hyde (1995) 84 A Crim R 519 Bunning v Cross (1979) 141 CLR 54
PARTIES : Regina (Commonwealth) (Crown) Nikytas Nicholas Petroulias (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate