NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: BELL v VEIGEL; BELL v BROUGHTON; BROUGHTON v VEIGEL (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 110
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 May 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 1; Tobias JA at 1
DECISION: Each appeal and Mrs Broughton's cross-appeal upheld with costs.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – Costs – general rule – costs follow the event – costs of whole action – where offer of compromise made – costs at first instance – costs on appeal – co-defendants – multiple matters
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005
Edwin BELL Jamie DEE PARTIES: John VEIGEL bht Paula TALLEN The Nominal Defendant Dean Leslie DAVIS Christie BROUGHTON
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40470/2005; 40471/2005; 40499/2005
P R Garling SC/ C Thompson (Bell and Dee) R Letherbarrow SC/ A Stone (Veigel) COUNSEL: L M Morris QC/ J M Morris (Broughton CA40470/05,CA 40499/05) R McIlwaine SC/ J Davidson (Broughton CA40471/05) R Stitt QC/ D Wilson (The Nominal Defendant) R Seton SC/ P Carr (Davis)
Carrolll & O'Dea (Bell and Dee) Stacks Goudkamp (Veigel) Moray & Agnew (Broughton, CA40470/05, CA40499/05) SOLICITORS: Keddies Litigation Lawyers (Broughton, CA40471/05) Sparke Helmore (The Nominal Defendant) Ferguson Bolton (Davis)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 8279/2002 DC 1082/2004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Coorey DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate