NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 183 A Crim R 526
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Nowak v R [2008] NSWCCA 89
HEARING DATE(S): 21 April 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 April 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Bell JA at 37; Barr J at 38; Buddin J at 1
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - appeal against sentence - offence of maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm - whether error demonstrated in relation to use of various aggravating factors in passing sentence
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Elyard [2006] NSWCCA 43 R v Jammeh [2004] NSWCCA 327 R v Murphy [2005] NSWCCA 182 CASES CITED : R v Solomon (2005) 153 A Crim R 32 R v Tadrosse (2005) 65 NSWLR 740 R v Youkhana [2004] NSWCCA 412 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383
PARTIES: Krysztof Kowak Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3846
COUNSEL: G Walsh (Solicitor) (Applicant) G Rowling (Crown)
SOLICITORS: Greg Walsh & Co (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 07/21/1064
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 10 August 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/3846
BELL JA BARR J BUDDIN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate