NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 25 ACLC 1,205
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Oliver Banovec (No. 2) [2007] NSWSC 961
HEARING DATE(S) : 23 May 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : See para 42 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – ASIC investigations – Asset preservation orders under s 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Jurisdictional basis for making orders – Held that Court has inherent jurisdiction, or jurisdiction under s 23 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), to make an asset preservation order where power to appoint receiver under s 1323(1)(h) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is engaged. - CORPORATIONS – ASIC investigations – Orders prohibiting person from leaving Australia. - (Cth) Corporations Act 2001 s 1323 - (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 ss 23 and 66(4)
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Companies Act 1981 (Cth) Securities Industry Act 1980 (Cth)
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Oliver Banovec [2007] NSWSC 610 Corporate Affairs Commission v Smithson [1984] 3 NSWLR 547 Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Lombard Nash International Pty Ltd & Ors (No. 3) (1987) 12 ACLR 113 Corporate Affairs Commission v Walker (1987) 11 ACLR 884 Corporate Affairs Commission v Lone Star Exploration NL (1988) 50 SASR 24 Corporate Affairs Commission of NSW v Transphere Pty Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 596 Australian Securities Commission v AS Nominees Ltd (1995) 62 FCR 504 Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 PMT Partners Pty Ltd (in liq) v Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service (1995) 184 CLR 301 Australian Gas Light Company v Mine Subsidence Board (2006) 147 LGERA 433 FAR Bennion, Statutory Interpretation, 4th ed (2002) London, Butterworths Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1992) 9 ACSR 404 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Burke [2000] NSWSC 694 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2001) 38 ACSR 266 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rajnoch [2003] QSC 46 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Michalik (2004) 211 ALR 285 CASES CITED : Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Burnard [2006] NSWSC 611 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (2006) 57 ACSR 307 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No. 14) (2007) 158 FCR 92; 25 ACLC 184 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 ASIC v Eric Krecichwost & Ors [2007] NSWSC ... Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 44 FLR 125 Dunkel v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 27 FCR 524 Johns v Connor (1992) 35 FCR 1 Attorney-General v Great Eastern Railway Co (1880) 5 AC 473 In re Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission [2002] HRLR 35; [2002] UKHL 25 Wentworth Securities Ltd v Jones [1980] AC 74 Bermingham v Corrective Services Commission of New South Wales (1988) 15 NSWLR 292 Tokyo Mart Pty Ltd v Campbell (1988) 15 NSWLR 275 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85 R v Young (1999) 46 NSWLR 681 Nippon Yusen Kaisha v Karageorgis [1975] 1 WLR 1093; (1975) 3 All ER 282 Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulk Carriers SA [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 509 Meagher, Gummow & Lehane, Equity: Doctrines and Remedies, 2nd ed (1985) Sydney, Butterworths
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate