NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 213 FLR 293
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 22) [2007] NSWSC 692
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 and 22 June 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
DECISION : The claim of client legal privilege with respect to the documents in MFI11 is upheld. The Accused's application to inspect the documents produced under subpoena is declined.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - trial on indictment before Supreme Court - subpoena directed to Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - seeks production of notes of conferences between prosecuting counsel and solicitors and Crown witnesses - claim of client legal privilege - whether Part 3.10 Evidence Act 1995 or common law principles apply to privilege claim - relationship between client legal privilege and prosecution duty of disclosure - whether privilege waived by prosecution calling witnesses at committal proceedings or earlier trials of Accused - claim for privilege upheld
Evidence Act 1995 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Supreme Court Rules Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
R v Petroulias (No. 1) [2006] NSWSC 788 Petroulias v R [2007] NSWCCA 134 R v Petroulias (No. 9) [2007] NSWSC 84 R v Petroulias (No. 16) [2007] NSWSC 506 R v Reardon (No. 2) (2004) 60 NSWLR 454 R v Spiteri (2004) 61 NSWLR 369 Mallard v The Queen [2005] 224 CLR 125 R v Bunting (2002) 84 SASR 378 Filipowski v Nikolaos (2004) 136 LGERA 157 R v Ronen [2004] NSWSC 1305 R v Haydon (No. 5) [2005] SASC 19 R v Tracey (No. 2) [2005] SASC 356 Goldberg v Ng (1996) 185 CLR 83 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 CASES CITED : Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Limited v Victorian WorkCover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1089 National Crime Authority v S (1991) 29 FCR 203 AWB Limited v Cole (No. 5) (2006) 155 FCR 30 Esso Australia Resources Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] 201 CLR 49 Mok v New South Wales Crime Commission [2002] NSWCA 53 Wilson v State of New South Wales [2003] NSWSC 805 Meteyard v Love (2005) 224 ALR 588; [2005] NSWCA 444 Seven Network Limited v News Limited (2005) 144 FCR 379 Fleming v White (1981) 2 NSWLR 219 Epacris Pty Limited v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources [2007] NSWCCA 76 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1978) 36 FLR 244 Island Maritime Limited v Filipowski [2006] 226 CLR 328 Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate