NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sharpless v McKibbin (Costs) [2007] NSWSC 1520
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 December 2007 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 30 December 2007
DECISION : No order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW – de facto relationship – costs – whether costs should follow the event – relevant considerations – substantial success – adjustive order below jurisdictional limit of Local Court. - COSTS – proceedings under Property (Relationships) Act 1984 – whether costs should follow the event – relevant considerations – substantial success– adjustive order below the jurisdictional limit of Local Court.
(NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(1), LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act 1984, ss 8, 20 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, rr 42.1, 42.30
Dunstan v Rickwood (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 266 CASES CITED : Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 P J and R M Farnell (1995) 128 FLR 374; (1996) 20 Fam LR 513) Sharpless v McKibbin [2007] NSWSC 1498
PARTIES : Paul Anthony Sharpless (plaintiff) Paul Ellis McKibbin (defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5396/05
COUNSEL : Mr Reeve (sol) (plaintiff) Ms Stubbs (defendant)
SOLICITORS : Marsdens Law Group (plaintiff) Cunningham Legal Pty Limited (defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BRERETON J
Thursday 20 December 2007
5396/05 Paul Sharpless v Paul McKibbin JUDGMENT (ex tempore – costs) 1 HIS HONOUR: On 14 December 2007 I published reasons for judgment [Sharpless v McKibbin [2007] NSWSC 1498] and made orders by way of adjustment of settlement of property interests under (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act 1984, s 20, as follows (at [104]): Subject to any submissions which may be made as to their form, my order is:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate