NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Crocombe v Pine Forests of Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] NSWSC 217
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 March 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
DECISION : Orders made in accordance with amended interlocutory process.
CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY [314]- Torrens Title- Tenants in common in undivided shares- Separate certificates of title- Some shares encumbered by mortgages- Sale in lieu of partition- Trustees for sale of whole of the land take free of encumbrances affecting undivided shares- Mortgagees' rights will be against fund raised by sale of the whole.
Conveyancing Act 1919, s 66G LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 601EE Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), Pt IV Real Property Act 1900, s 138
Arrow Custodians Pty Ltd v Pine Forests of Australia Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 341 Botterill v Botterill (2000) 10 BPR 18,787 Burton v Arcus (2004) 51 ACSR 683 Burton v Arcus (2006) 200 FLR 1 CASES CITED : Crocombe v Pine Forests of Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 219 ALR 692 Dunham v Minard (1834) 4 Paige Ch 441; 3 NY Ch Ann 506 Fulton v 523 Nominees Pty Ltd [1984] VR 200 Jadu Nath Roy v Parameswar Mullick (1939) LR 67 1A 11 McMahon v A F Wade Pty Ltd [1983] WAR 152
Peter Charles Hicks and William Frederick Tonkin (Applicants) John Gordon Crocombe (1st Respondent) PARTIES : Andrea Judith Crocombe (2nd Respondent) Pine Forests of Australia Pty Ltd (3rd Respondent) Ausforest Ltd (4th Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate