NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Malo v South Sydney District Junior Rugby Football League [2008] NSWSC 552
HEARING DATE(S) : 30/05/2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J
DECISION : The plaintiff is granted leave to file a Fourth Amended Statement of Claim. The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of this application.
CATCHWORDS : Amendment to Statement of Claim - reliance upon s74 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 - whether the s82 time limitation applies to amendment - whether new cause of action raised - whether amendment futile - whether prejudice suffered by defendants.
Civil Liability Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 Trade Practices Act 1974
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Arturi v Zupps Motors Pty Limited (1980) 49 FLR 283; 33 ALR 243 at 245-246 CASES CITED : Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association Inc & Ors (1986) FCA 357 at [57] The Queen v Federal Court of Australia Ex parte: WA National Football League (1978-1979) 143 CLR 190 at 233-34
Harry Malo - Plaintiff PARTIES : South Sydney District Junior Rugby Football League Limited - First Defendant Maroubra Rugby League Football Club Incorporated - Fourth Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20659/2001
Mr F Tuscano - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr S Walsh - First Defendant Mr K Rewell SC - Fourth Defendant
Maurice Blackburn Cashman - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Riley Gray-Spencer Lawyers - First Defendant Thompson Cooper Lawyers Pty Ltd - Fourth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate