NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Benton v Scott's Refrigerated Freightways [2008] NSWCA 143
HEARING DATE(S): 3 April 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 June 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Bell JA at 109; McDougall J at 110
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: TORT – negligence – duty of care – professional driver injured while alighting from vehicle owned by Respondent – where Respondent was not the employer of Appellant driver – nature of duty of care owed by Respondent to Appellant – whether relevant difference between duty Respondent owed Appellant in its capacity as owner of the vehicle and the duty it would owe if it were the employer of the Appellant – whether trial judge erred in finding that duty had not been breached – whether trial judge gave sufficient reasons for judgment - PROCEDURE – pleadings – defective pleadings – statement of claim – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 14.7 and 14.19 – material facts which must be stated for a claim under s 151Z(2)(c) and s 151Z(2)(d) Workers Compensation Act 1987 – necessity of pleading failure to pass permanent impairment threshold set by s 151H Workers Compensation Act – whether consensual abandonment of pleadings by the way the parties conducted their case - EVIDENCE – witnesses – whether effect of decision in Jones v Dunkel is to require or merely licence the drawing of inferences when a witness is not called - COSTS – consequences of failure of appeal on liability – whether deficiencies in defendant's pleading would make any difference to usual order as to costs
Evidence Act 1995 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Workers Compensation Act 1987
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate