NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : McKay & anor v McKay (Costs) [2008] NSWSC 256
HEARING DATE(S) : 28 February 2008 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expedition List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 28 February 2008
DECISION : Plaintiffs to pay 60% of defendant's costs
CATCHWORDS : COSTS – upon failure of joint venture between family members – analogy with partnership and s 66G Conveyancing Act proceedings – where plaintiffs fail on main contested issues
LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 66G
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
CASES CITED : McKay & anor v McKay [2008] NSWSC 177
Carolyn Suzanne McKay (first plaintiff) PARTIES : Ferdinando Schiavo (second plaintiff) David McKay (defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4043/05
COUNSEL : M W Sneddon (plaintiffs) M B Evans (defendant)
SOLICITORS : Bull Son & Schmidt (plaintiffs) Whitfields Solicitors (defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION EXPEDITION LIST
BRERETON J
Thursday 28 February 2008
4043/05 Carolyn Suzanne McKay & anor v David McKay JUDGMENT (ex tempore) 1 HIS HONOUR: On 21 February 2008 I gave judgment in these proceedings [McKay & anor v McKay [2008] NSWSC 177], expressing the view that trustees should be appointed to sell the property; to pay from the proceeds of sale, the costs of sale; to divide the balance into two shares, called the plaintiffs' share and the defendant's share; from the plaintiffs' share to deduct the amount required to discharge the mortgage and to pay the balance to the plaintiffs; and from the defendant's share to deduct and pay to the plaintiffs an occupation fee calculated as indicated in the judgment, the amount of rates and outgoings to which I found the plaintiffs were entitled, and then to pay the balance remaining of the defendant's share to the defendant. I concluded that there should be judgment that the defendant pay the plaintiffs the sum of $20,000 together with interest at the appropriate rate, and that all the consolidated proceedings should otherwise be dismissed. I directed the parties to bring in short minutes to give effect to the judgment, and indicated that I would hear them on the question of costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate