NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Charlesworth v Herring [2007] NSWSC 312
HEARING DATE(S) : 30/03/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
DECISION : Application dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - Family Provision and Maintenance - Failure by testator to make sufficient provision - Testator left entirety of a relatively small estate to his defacto partner with gift over to her daughter by another marriage if she predeceased him - She did - The daughter's income barely covered her expenses and her assets were minimal - The deceased treated his defacto partner and her daughter as a surrogate family - He had no contact with his former wife and children and left them to care for themselves - The disable adult son of the deceased, whose needs were great, sought his entire estate - He had no contact with the deceased since he was 6 a period of 36 years - Whether the applicant was left by the deceased without adequate provision for proper maintenance, education and advancement in life
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 Testator's Family Maintenance Act (Qld)
Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1961-1962) 107 CLR 9 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 CASES CITED : Lo Surdo v The Public Trustee [2005] NSWSC 1186 Walker v Walker, NSWSC, 17 May 1996 Palmer v Dolman; Dolman v Palmer [2005] NSWCA 361 Nichols v Hall [2006] NSWSC 1377 Golosky v Golosky, NSWCA, 5 October 1993, unreported
PARTIES : Alan John Charlesworth by his Tutor Kathryn Charlesworth - Plaintiff Natalie Jane Herring - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate