NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Christopher Edmund Lumb and Anor -v- Diana Faye McMillan and Anor [2007] NSWSC 386
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 November 2007 1 December 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice McLaughlin
DECISION : 1. I order that, in lieu of the benefits given to him by the will of the late Frederick Cecil Lumb ("the Deceased"), the Plaintiff Christopher Edmund Lumb receive a legacy in the sum of $1,170,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid on or before 23 May 2007, and if not so paid, to bear interest at the rates prescribed for unpaid legacies in the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898; 2. I order that, in lieu of the benefits given to her by the will of the the Deceased, the Plaintiff Judith Anne Eslick receive a legacy in the sum of $1,180,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid on or before 23 May 2007, and if not so paid, to bear interest at the rates prescribed for unpaid legacies in the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898; 3. I order that the costs of the Plaintiffs on the party and party basis and the costs of the Defendants on the indemnity basis be paid out of the estate of the Deceased; 4. The exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Succession. Family Provision. Large estate. Claim by two adult children. Financial and material circumstances of each Plaintiff. Whether each Plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for his or her proper maintenance. Appropriate form of order.
LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982
CASES CITED : Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191
Christopher Edward Lumb (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Judith Anne Eslick (Second Plaintiff) Diana Faye McMillan (First Defendant) William McMillan (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate