NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: CSR Limited v Amaca Pty Limited [2008] NSWCA 329 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 8 September 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 3 December 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Giles JA at 83; Young CJ in Eq at 84
CA 40832/07: the McDonald matter: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Judgment and orders of O'Meally P in the Dust Diseases Tribunal made 14 September 2007 set aside; 3. Judgment for the appellant, CSR Limited, against the respondent, Amaca Pty Limited, on the cross-claim; DECISION: 4. The respondent is to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and at first instance. CA 40664/07: the Jones-Mashman matter: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Judgment and orders of O'Meally P in the Dust Diseases Tribunal made 30 August 2007 set aside; 3. Remit the matter to the Dust Diseases Tribunal for determination of any outstanding issues between the parties; 4. The respondent is to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and to date at first instance.
CATCHWORDS: PARTNERSHIP- construction of partnership agreement – where partner makes a cross-claim for contribution from other partner under indemnity clause – indemnity clause operates in relation to claims that extended beyond the partnership period - PARTNERSHIP – construction of deed of dissolution - release held to protect the parties from any claim, past, present or future that one partner might have had under its right of indemnity - DUST DISEASES – causation – party is liable if its negligence was a cause of, or contributed to the harm suffered - DUST DISEASES – Dust Diseases Tribunal – jurisdiction to hear claims and cross-claims made in respect of allegations of a dust-related condition
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate