NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Mallik v McGeown & Anor [2008] NSWCA 230 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 1 August 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 September 2008
JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Campbell JA at 128; Bell JA at 129
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: DEFAMATION – trial – whether jury determination that imputation the plaintiff was demented was not defamatory was one no reasonable jury could reach – whether jury determination that imputations not conveyed by publication was one no reasonable jury could reach – Defamation Act 1974 s 7A(3) - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – misdirection by trial judge – whether primary judge misdirected jury on the test for determining whether an imputation is defamatory – whether alleged misdirection led to a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 51.53 - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – non-direction by trial judge – whether substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice sufficient to warrant new trial order where trial judge did not direct jury on case not raised by party – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 51.53 - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – whether primary judge's directions sufficient to cure submissions by respondents' counsel – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 51.53 - LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – duty to the court – misdirection as ground of appeal – duty of counsel to specify at trial part of summing-up complained of and redirections sought. (D)
Defamation Act 1974 LEGISLATION CITED: Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 225 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Reading [2004] NSWCA 411 Beran v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 107 Boyd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 449 Bright v Sampson and Duncan Enterprises Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 346 Broome v Agar (1928) 138 LT 698 Burchett v Kane [1980] 2 NSWLR 266(n) Burston v Melbourne and Metropolitan Tramways Board [1948] HCA 36; (1948) 78 CLR 143 Cairns v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 708 Calin v Greater Union Organisation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 23; (1991) 173 CLR 33 Capital & Counties Bank Ltd v George Henty & Sons (1882) 7 App Cas 741 Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mohammed [2008] NSWCA 21 Eggins v Brooms Head Bowling and Recreational Club Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 521. Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52; (2005) 79 ALJR 1716 Gardener v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 10 Gardiner v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1942) 42 SR (NSW) 171 Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] UKHL 40; [2002] 4 All ER 732 CASES CITED: Harvey v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 255 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Gacic [2007] HCA 28; (2007) 230 CLR 291 John Fairfax Publications Pty v Rivkin [2003] HCA 50; (2003) 77 ALJR 1657 Jones v Skelton [1963] SR (NSW) 644; [1963] 3 All ER 952 Justin v Associated Newspapers Ltd (1966) 86 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 17 Kelly v Daily Telegraph Newspaper Co (1897) 18 LR (NSW) 358 Lutwyche v Jiweni Pty Ltd (Court of Appeal, 30 July 1998, unreported, BC9803438) Mallik v McGeown [2007] NSWSC 438 Mastronardi v State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 54 Morawski v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1988) 14 NSWLR 374 Morgan v Lingen (1863) 8 LT 800 R v Hines (1991) 24 NSWLR 737 Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton [2008] NSWCA 66; (2008) Aust Torts Reports 81-946 Reader's Digest Services Pty Limited v Lamb [1982] HCA 4; (1982) 150 CLR 500 Singleton v Ffrench (1986) 5 NSWLR 425 Tory v Megna [2007] NSWCA 13 Uren v Australian Consolidated Press Ltd (1965) 66 SR (NSW) 271 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; (2005) 224 CLR 300 Youssoupoff v MGM Pictures Ltd (1934) 50 TLR 581
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate