NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Jerrick v Greyhound & Harness Racing Regulatory Authority & Anor [2008] NSWSC 203
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 and 22 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ
DECISION : Application for Judicial Review dismissed
CATCHWORDS : No denial of procedural fairness or jurisdictional error on the part of Greyhound and Harness Racing Appeals Tribunal - Duties of specialist Tribunal acting on its own specialist knowledge and its capacity to draw inferences
LEGISLATION CITED : Greyhound and Harness Racing Administration (Appeals) Regulation 2004
Aluminium Louvres & Ceilings Pty Limited v Xue Qin Zheng [2006] NSWCA 34 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Cameron v Holt (1980) 142 CLR 342 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372 Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd [1977] 1 All ER 454 F R Waring (UK) Ltd v Administracao Geral etc [1983] Lloyds L R 45 He Kaw Teh (1985) 157 CLR 523 McPhee v S Bennett Ltd 1934 WN (NSW) 8 at 9 CASES CITED : Padfield v Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997 Proudman v Dayman (1941) 67 CLR 536 Public Service Board of NSW v Osmond (1985-1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Industrial Appeals Court; Exp Maher 197 Re Refugee Review Tribunal Exp. Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 Sherras v De Rutzen [1895] 1 QB 918 Slapjums v City of Knox (No 1) 1978 VR 325 The Queen v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board, Exp Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100 Turnbull v NSW Medical Tribunal Board [1976] 2 NSWLR 281
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate