NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 654
HEARING DATE(S) : 16/06/08, 17/06/08, 18/06.08, 19/06/08, 20/06/08, 23/06/08, 24/06/08, 25/06/08, 26/6/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Documents at Tab 698 and Tab 701 rejected. All other documents admitted without s 136(a) limitation on use
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - admissibility - tender of documents containing statements of or attributed to second plaintiff - business records - second plaintiff does not intend to give evidence - inability to cross examine - whether use should be limited to proof of words spoken - whether certain business records prepared in contemplation of legal proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 48(1)(b), 59, 60, 69(1), 69(2), 69(3), 128, 135, 136(a)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Bakerland Pty Ltd v Coleridge [2002] NSWCA 30 Compafina Bank v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1982] 1 NSWLR 409 CASES CITED : Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWSC 222 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; (1999) 196 CLR 297 R v BD (1997) 94 A Crim R 131 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348; (2005) 224 ALR 317
Tim Barr Pty Limited - First Plaintiff PARTIES : Timothy James Barr - Second Plaintiff Narui Gold Coast Pty Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2762/02
COUNSEL : Mr R G McHugh SC/Mr J E Lazarus - Plaintiffs Mr M L D Einfeld QC/Mr R E Dubler SC/Mr A C Harding - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate