NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : White v Patterson [2008] NSWSC 1395 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : Written submissions on costs: 30/11/08, 8/12/08, 12/12/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 December 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : See paragraph [27]
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - costs - upon adjustment of interests in property under s 20 of Property (Relationships) Act 1984 - no matter of principle
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 101 Property (Relationships) Act 1984. s 20
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Baker v Towle [2008] NSWCA 73; (2008) 39 Fam LR 323 Dunstan v Rickwood (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 266; (2007) 38 Fam LR 491 CASES CITED : Hayes v Marquis [2008] NSWCA 10 Kardos v Sarbutt (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 206 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 1; (1998) 193 CLR 72 White v Patterson [2008] NSWSC 1226
Leanne Michelle White - Plaintiff PARTIES : David Joseph Patterson - First Defendant Alice Mia Vors Patterson by her tutor Evelyn Ann Eyland - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3540/06
Mr J R Hamilton - Plaintiff COUNSEL : First Defendant in person Ms K Richardson - Second Defendant
Rice More & Gibson - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : First Defendant in person Second Defendant by her tutor, Ms E A Eyland
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate