NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Ilvariy Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 9
HEARING DATE(S): 29 and 30 November 2007
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 February 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Beazley JA at 97; Hodgson JA at 98
1 In par [1075] of the judgment of Smart AJ vary par [2] by substituting $170,000 for $230,000, and vary par [5] by substituting $20,000 for $50,000 DECISION: 2 The respondents pay half of the appellants' costs of the appeal 3 The respondents to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise entitled.
CATCHWORDS: DAMAGES – trespass to property – general and aggravated damages – principle of no double counting – whether manifestly excessive - DAMAGES – trespass to property – exemplary damages – proper approach for awarding – type of conduct attracting – whether manifestly excessive - TRADE PRACTICES – consumer protection – misleading and deceptive conduct – whether in trade or commerce – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 – application to prescribed information providers - whether conduct protected by Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 65A - TRADE PRACTICES – consumer protection – interpretation of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 and s 82 – whether the provisions should be read down so as not to extend to publications that engage defamation law – whether the provisions should be read down so as not to extend to publications defensible under defamation law - WORDS AND PHRASES – "in trade or commerce"
Civil Liability Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED: Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Advanced Hair Studio Pty Ltd v TVW Enterprises Ltd (1987) 18 FCR 1 ASIC v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Australian Ocean Line Pty Ltd v West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1983) 47 ALR 497 Australian Ocean Line Pty Ltd v West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1985) 58 ALR 549 Avram v Inches [1999] TASSC 10 Bond v Barry [2007] FCA 1484 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council [2001] HCA 29; (2001) 206 CLR 512 Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027 Chulcough v Holley (1968) 41 ALJR 336 Collaroy Services Beach Club Ltd v Haywood [2007] NSWCA 21 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Cornwall v Rowan [2004] SASC 384; (2004) 90 SASR 269 Edwards v Attorney General (NSW) [2004] NSWCA 272; (2004) 60 NSWLR 667 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 Gray v Motor Accident Commission [1998] HCA 70; (1998) 196 CLR 1 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10; (2003) 56 NSWLR 298 Hearn v O'Rourke [2002] FCA 1179; (2002) 193 ALR 264 Hearn v O'Rourke [2003] FCAFC 78; (2003) 129 FCR 64 CASES CITED: Henry v TVW Enterprises Ltd (1990) 3 WAR 474 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159 Houghton v Arms [2006] HCA 59; (2006) 225 CLR 553 Hunter Area Health Service v Marchlewski [2000] NSWCA 294; (2000) 51 NSWLR 268 Moran v McMahon (1985) 3 NSWLR 700 New South Wales v Ibbett [2006] HCA 57; (2006) 229 CLR 638 New South Wales v Ibbett [2005] NSWCA 445 New South Wales v Paige [2002] NSWCA 235; (2002) 60 NSWLR 371 New South Wales v Riley [2003] NSWCA 208; (2003) 57 NSWLR 496 Planet Fisheries Pty Ltd v La Rosa (1968) 119 CLR 118 Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 52; (2003) 216 CLR 327 Sattin v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (1996) 39 NSWLR 32 Steiner Wilson & Webster Pty Ltd v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] ACTSC 123; (2000) Aust Torts Reps 81–537 Sullivan v Moody [2001] HCA 59; (2001) 207 CLR 562 Tame v New South Wales [2002] HCA 35; (2002) 211 CLR 317 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Anning [2002] NSWCA 82; (2002) 54 NSWLR 333 Versace v Monte (2002) 119 FCR 349 Village Building Co Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 240; (2004) 139 FCR 330 Wide Bay-Burnett Television Ltd v Bradford [1998] QCA 443
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate