NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Mouscas v R [2008] NSWCCA 181
HEARING DATE(S): 30 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 August 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; James J at 2; Price J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - possession of child pornography - sentence not manifestly excessive
Crimes Act 1900 s 91H(3) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code (Cth) s 474.19(1)(a)(i) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 12(1)(c)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Liddington (1997) 97 A Crim R 400 CASES CITED : R v Fowler [2007] ACTCA 4 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370
PARTIES: Alexios Mouscas Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/5918
COUNSEL: C Nash and O Kang (Applicant) G O'Donnell (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Ford Criminal Lawyers (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Blackmore SC DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 14 December 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/5918
ALLSOP P JAMES J PRICE J
6 August 2008 MOUSCAS V R Judgment 1 ALLSOP P: I agree with Price J. 2 JAMES J: I agree with Price J. 3 PRICE J: On 14 December 2007 Alexios Mouscas, the applicant, was sentenced in the District Court for one count of possession of child pornography contrary to s 91H(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 to a term of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 1 year 6 months and a balance of term of 1 year 3 months. As the sentence commenced on the day of sentence, the applicant will be released to parole on 13 June 2009. The overall sentence expires on 13 September 2010. Pursuant to s 166 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 an offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography contrary to s 474.19(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Code (Cth) had been placed on a certificate. 4 A plea of guilty was entered in the Local Court and adhered to in the District Court. The sentencing Judge allowed a discount of twenty per cent for the plea about which the applicant does not complain. 5 An offence contrary to s 91H(3) is punishable by imprisonment for 5 years. 6 The applicant appeals against the severity of the sentence on two grounds which are:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate