NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: SPRUILL v R [2008] NSWCCA 39
HEARING DATE(S): 30 January 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 February 2008
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Kirby J at 71; Buddin J at 72
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – whether presumptive evidence of blood stains should have been admitted – Whether direction on unreliability under s 165(1) of the Evidence Act should have been given – Whether verdict of guilty unreasonable.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act ss 55, 103, 135, 137, 165
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Cakovski [2004] NSWCCA 280 Lean & Aland v R (1993) 66 A Crim R 296 CASES CITED : R v McCormack (1996) 85 A Crim R 445 R v Robinson [2003] NSWCCA 118 R v Sanford (1994) 33 NSWLR 172
PARTIES: Richard Spruill (Appellant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/4599
COUNSEL: M C RAMAGE QC (Appellant) P MILLER (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Jeffreys & Associates (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 03/41/0194
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Murrell DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 4 October 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2005/4599 DC 03/41/0194
HODGSON JA KIRBY J BUDDIN J
29 FEBRUARY 2008 Richard SPRUILL v REGINA Judgment 1 HODGSON JA: On 12 July 2005, the appellant was indicted before Murrell DCJ in the District Court of New South Wales on the following counts: (1) That he on 8 April 2003 at Nowra in the Sate of New South Wales did wound [the complainant] with intent to murder [the complainant]. (2) In the alternative, that he on 8 April 2003 at Nowra in the State of New South Wales maliciously wounded [the complainant] with intent to do grievous bodily harm. 2 The appellant pleaded not guilty, and was tried before her Honour and a jury of twelve. 3 On 29 July 2005, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty on count 1 and guilty on count 2. 4 On 4 October 2005, the appellant was sentenced to a non-parole period of six years to commence on 8 April 2003 and to expire on 7 April 2009, with a balance of term of four years to expire on 7 April 2013. 5 The appellant appeals from his conviction.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate