NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Nirimba Developments Pty Limited v Sertari Pty Limited [2007] NSWSC 252
HEARING DATE(S) : 14 and 15 February 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 22 March 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
DECISION : Order that defendant consent to the lodgement of a development application for the use of a right of way.
CATCHWORDS : EASEMENTS – Right of way – Right of carriageway in favour of whole or any part of dominant tenement for "any purpose" – Subdivision of dominant land – Large residential development proposed on one lot of subdivided dominant tenement – Consent of owner of servient tenement required for lodgement of application in Land and Environment Court for use of right of carriageway for proposed development – Consent refused – Whether mandatory order for consent should be made – Construction of terms of grant of easement – Evidence admissible on construction – Whether question of excessive use special consideration or one going to construction
Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 EPA Regulation 2000
Jelbert v Davis [1968] 1 WLR 589 Kirkjian v Towers (unreported NSWSC Waddell J 7 March 1975 and Waddell CJ in Eq 6 July 1987) CASES CITED : Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Westfield Management Limited [2006] NSWCA 337 South Metropolitan Cemetery Company v Eden (1855) 16 CB 42 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co [1934] Ch 190
PARTIES : Nirimba Developments Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Sertari Pty Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5386/06
COUNSEL : Mr S Kalfas SC with him Mr S Flanigan (Plaintiff) Mr T S Hale SC with him Mr M A Izzo (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate