NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes [2008] NSWCA 246
HEARING DATE(S): 6 August 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 October 2008
JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Bell JA at 2; McDougall J at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: EVIDENCE – standard of proof – on balance of probabilities - where house and contents damaged by fire – onus on plaintiff to show that fire caused by negligent acts and omissions alleged against defendants – tribunal of fact must feel sense of actual persuasion – circumstantial case – not necessary for proof on balance of probabilities that all possible causes inconsistent with negligence be excluded. - EVIDENCE – expert opinion evidence – distinction between inference and speculation – expert evidence as to causation – whether more than conjecture - tribunal of fact not bound to accept opinions of experts. - CONTRACT – breach of contract – need to prove that alleged breach caused loss – tribunal of fact not bound by experts' opinion as to existence of causal link. - NEGLIGENCE – duty of care – need to prove that alleged breach caused loss – tribunal of fact not bound by experts' opinions as to existence of causal link. - PRACTICE – discretion to allow affidavit to be read when maker not available, when required, for cross-examination – no question of principle.
Civil Liability Act 2002 LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 Home Building Act 1989
Bennett v Minister for Community Welfare (1992) 176 CLR 408 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 Carr v Baker (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 301 Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 152 Chappel v Hart (1998)195 CLR 232 Davie v Lord Provost, Magistrates and Councillors of the City of Edinburgh (1953) SC 34 Davies v Taylor [1974] AC 207 Girlock (Sales) Pty Limited v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 Helton v Allen (1940) 63 CLR 691 CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Limited (1990) 169 CLR 638 March v E & MH Stramare Pty Limited (1991) 171 CLR 506 Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 Rhesa Shipping SA v Edmunds [1985] 1 W LR 948 Ruddock v Taylor (2003) 58 NSW LR 269 Schellenberg v Tunnel Holdings Pty Limited (2000) 200 CLR 121 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 50 ALJR 720 West v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1981) 148 CLR 62 X and Y (by her tutor X) v Pal (1991) 23 NSWLR 26
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate