NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 168 A Crim R 89
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Charara v The Commissioner of Police NSW [2007] NSWSC 26 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 30/01/2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 February 2007
JUDGMENT OF : Associate Justice Malpass
DECISION : The proceedings are dismissed. The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : Carrying out of forensic procedures on serious indictable offenders in a place of detention - non-intimate procedure (hair sample) - refusal of consent - order by senior police officer - threshold requirements - construction of statutory provisions - jurisdiction of a Court.
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 (NSW)
PARTIES : Jamal Charara The Commissioner of Police NSW
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10878/06
COUNSEL : In Person (Pl) Mr T. Ryan (Def)
SOLICITORS : Assistant Commissioner Lee Shearer (Def)
- 9 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MALPASS
5 FEBRUARY 2007
10878/06 Jamal Charara v The Commissioner of Police NSW
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: On 9 April 1999, the plaintiff was convicted in respect of a number of offences (including resist arrest and assault police). He was sentenced to six months periodic detention. 2 Whilst he was in periodic detention (prior to 21 March 2002), he was informed by the corrective services liaison officer that a testing procedure would be taking place the following weekend and that he should seek independent legal advice prior thereto. The plaintiff made contact with his barrister (Mr Kennedy). 3 During the period from September 2001 to December 2002, Sergeant Hassett was a member of the forensic procedures testing team (as a team leader). On 21 March 2002, he attended Parramatta Correctional Centre with the team. The plaintiff was requested to undergo a testing procedure. He was told that the purpose of the exercise was to enable a sample to be stored in the DNA database. Sergeant Hassett has deposed to the following:- "I then went through the "Consent Form" with Mr Charara and asked all the appropriate questions as required by law with regard to the procedure".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate