NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : W & P Reedy Pty Ltd v Macadams Baking Systems (Pty) Ltd [2007] NSWSC 75
HEARING DATE(S) : 09/02/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 February 2007
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Originating process dismissed with costs
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - application to set aside - whether plaintiff has offsetting claims greater than amount of statutory demand
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss.459G, 459H(1)(b), 459H(5)
Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 CASES CITED : Macleay Nominees Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 743 Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd (1993) 12 ACSR 341
PARTIES : W & P Reedy Pty Limited - Plaintiff Macadams Baking Systems (Pty) Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3566/06
COUNSEL : Mr M.J. Ward - Plaintiff Mr J.E. Lazarus - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Home Wilkinson Lowry - Plaintiff Arnold Bloch Leibler - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
BARRETT J
WEDNESDAY, 14 FEBRUARY 2007
3566/06 W & P REEDY PTY LIMITED v MACADAMS BAKING SYSTEMS (PTY) LIMITED
JUDGMENT 1 The plaintiff applies under s.459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for an order setting aside a statutory demand dated 5 June 2006 served on it by the defendant. The statutory demand relates to an aggregate sum of $109,568.55 made up of five separate debts related to invoices the numbers and dates of which are set out in the demand. The dates and amounts are: 15 December 2000 $ 9,913.70 10 July 2002 $48,912.67 10 September 2002 $40,168.50 27 February 2003 $ 7,953.00 25 October 2004 $ 2,620.68
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate