NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Markson v Cutler & anor [2007] NSWSC 1515
HEARING DATE(S) : 17-21 December 2007 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Expedition List
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 21 December 2007
DECISION : A deposit less than 10% was not accepted. Agent did not have authority to accept 5% deposit. Court should not readily decline to act on unchallenged evidence. Failure to afford party in default opportunity to rectify is not unconscionable. Deposit to be returned. Agent failed to communicate relevant information and disobeyed instructions. Agent to indemnify purchaser in respect of costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING – deposit – whether deposit less than 10% accepted. - AGENCY – real estate agent – whether authorised to accept less than 10% deposit. - AGENCY – duties – real estate agent – to communicate relevant information to principal – to assiduously endeavour to elicit best offer – to obey instructions. - EVIDENCE – cross-examination – significance of absence of cross-examination in case conducted on affidavit evidence. - EQUITY – estoppel – promissory estoppel – whether failure to afford party in default an opportunity to rectify breach is unconscionable – whether loss of such opportunity is relevant detriment. - EQUITY – relief against forfeiture – deposit – Conveyancing Act s 55(2A). - COSTS – where defendant succeeds on plaintiffs' claim – where cross-defendant responsible for litigation – whether cross-defendant should indemnify plaintiff.
(NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 LEGISLATION CITED : (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, ss 54A, 55(2A) (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Rule 42.1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate