NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Livingstone v Mitchell [2007] NSWSC 1477
HEARING DATE(S) : 19/11/07-23/11/07, 29/11/07, 17/12/07
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2007
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Walmsley AJ
DECISION : Judgment in favour of the plaintiffs for $10,000 and interest from 9 November 2001.; Costs reserved.
CATCHWORDS : LEGAL PROFESSION – negligence – conveyancing transaction – where defendants retained by plaintiffs on conveyancing transaction – where plaintiffs purchaser of land – where owner-builder work undertaken on land prior to sale – where contract for sale required certificate of insurance for owner-builder work to be attached – where certificate of insurance for owner-builder work not attached to contract – where plaintiffs had a right to rescind contract due to absence of certificate of insurance for owner-builder work – where defendants failed to ensure that contract for sale had certificate of insurance for owner-builder work attached – where defendants failed to advise plaintiffs of right to rescind contract – where owner-builder work on land defective – where plaintiffs obtained pre-purchase inspection report – where defendants admitted breach of duty - TORTS – negligence – causation – purchase of land – whether plaintiffs would have proceeded with purchase had they known of right to rescind contract – where plaintiffs purchased property to redevelop and sell in short term – where vendors in straitened financial circumstances - TORTS – negligence – damages – measure of damages – solicitor negligence in conveyancing transaction – whether plaintiffs able to recover cost of rectifying defects in owner-builder works – whether measure of damages amount that would have been recoverable under insurance policy for owner-builder work – whether damages limited to diminution of value of land – whether measure of damages amount by which plaintiff could have negotiated reduction in purchase price for absence of certificate of insurance for owner-builder work - TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – whether plaintiffs ought to have obtained more detailed pre-purchase inspection report - TORTS – negligence – failure to mitigate – where plaintiff failed to sell property upon discovering defects – where plaintiff failed to sue vendors – where vendors unable to be located - EVIDENCE – admissibility – torts – negligence – causation – where factual causation dependant on what plaintiff would have done if properly advised – inadmissibility of statements by plaintiffs regarding what they would have done if properly advised – whether evidence by non-plaintiff as to what he would have done but for the defendant's negligence admissible – Civil Liability Act 2005, s 5D(3)(b)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate