NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Five G Pty Ltd v Pinacle Funding Group Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 228 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 13/03/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 March 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Plaintiff given leave to discontinue on basis of payment of defendant's costs
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - application for order setting aside statutory demand - where plaintiff unable or unwilling to show that application for order filed and served within 21 days after service of statutory demand - where plaintiff accordingly seeks leave to discontinue - whether plaintiff should pay defendant's costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 459G Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rules 12.1, 42.19
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] HCA 43; (1995) 184 CLR 265 CASES CITED : Emhill Pty Ltd v Bonsoc Pty Ltd [2004] VSC 322; (2004) 50 ACSR 305 Scope Data Systems Pty Ltd v Goman [2007] NSWSC 278; (2007) 210 FLR 161
PARTIES : Five G Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Pinacle Funding Group Pty Ltd - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4008/07
COUNSEL : Mr T J Rickard - Plaintiff Mr M W Sneddon - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Simmons & McCartney - Plaintiff Worthington William Lawyers - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
BARRETT J
MONDAY, 17 MARCH 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate