NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1070
HEARING DATE(S) : Voir dire: 26/06/08, 27/06/08, 30/06/08/ 04/07/08, 28/07/08, 29/07/08, 27/08/08, 28/08/08
JUDGMENT DATE : 13 October 2008
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Ruling that s 119 of Evidence Act does not operate to prevent the adducing of evidence by means of the tender of the document in question.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - admissibility and relevancy - client legal privilege under Evidence Act 1995, s 119 - whether lost through disclosure within s 122(2) or s 122(4) - various dealings with privileged document over a period of several years - assessment of those dealings - WORDS AND PHRASES - "disclosed"
Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 91 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 117(1), 118, 119, 120, 122, 133 Supreme Court Rules 1970, rule 37.9
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) [1980] 1 All ER 393 Chen v City Convenience Leasing Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 297 Ex parte Cannar; Re Eubanks [2003] NSWSC 802 Foster v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1951] HCA 77; (1951) 82 CLR 606 Green v AMP Life Ltd [2005] NSWSC 95 CASES CITED : Kang v Kwan [2001] NSWSC 698 Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66; (1999) 201 CLR 1 Re David Payne & Co Ltd [1904] 2 Ch 608 Re Fenwick, Stobart & Co Ltd [1902] 1 Ch 507 Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd [1974] HCA 40; (1974) 131 CLR 634 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 657
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate