NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Claudio VERA [2008] NSWCCA 33
HEARING DATE(S): 6 February 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 February 2008
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 2; Fullerton J at 3
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against inadequacy of sentence - supply prohibited drug - neither latent nor patent error found - special circumstances justified - attitude of Crown on sentence
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Bezan [2004] NSWCCA 342; (2004) 147 A Crim R 430 R v Ceissman [2004] NSWCCA 466 CASES CITED : R v Chad (Court of Criminal Appeal, 13 May 1997, unreported) R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v MD, BM, NA, JT [2005] NSWCCA 342; (2005) 156 A Crim R 372 R v Pilley (1991) 56 A Crim R 202 R v Sharp (Court of Criminal Appeal, 23 March 1993, unreported) R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42
PARTIES: The Crown (Appl) Claudio Vera (Resp)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/4949
COUNSEL: G Rowling (Crown/Appl) H Dhanji (Resp)
SOLICITORS: Director of Public Prosecutions (Appl) Nyman Gibson Stewart (Resp)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 06/11/0475
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Coorey DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 28 September 2007
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2007/4949
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate