NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Holschier v State Parole Authority [2009] NSWSC 916
HEARING DATE(S) : 20 August 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF : R A Hulme J
DECISION : Relief sought refused
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review - error of law on face of record - jurisdictional error - decision of State Parole Authority - determination not to rescind order revoking parole - reasonableness of decision - onus of proof - not accepting evidence despite finding not untruthful - whether witnesses had interest in outcome of proceedings - assessment of voice identification evidence
Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Al Qatrani v Parole Authority of New South Wales [2007] NSWSC 1270 Attorney General for New South Wales v New South Wales State Parole Authority & Hall [2006] NSWSC 865 DCU v State Parole Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 526 Esho v Parole Board Authority of NSW [2006] NSWSC 304 CASES CITED : Hall v NSW State Parole Authority & Anor [2006] NSWSC 1411 Murray v NSW State Parole Authority [2008] NSWSC 962 Regina v Adler (2000) 52 NSWLR 451 Regina v Korgbara (2007) 71 NSWLR 187 Robinson v The Queen (1991) 180 CLR 531
John Raymond Holschier (Plaintiff) PARTIES : State Parole Authority (First Defendant) Attorney General for NSW (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate