NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 197 A Crim R 581
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Tsakonas v R [2009] NSWCCA 258
HEARING DATE(S): 2 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Hoeben J at 2; RA Hulme J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - money laundering - attempt to conceal large proceeds of fraud - attempt to corrupt bank official - treatment of prior record of driving offences - whether sentence manifestly excessive - whether error in not finding special circumstances
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Amendment Act 2005 Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Ali v R [2008] NSWCCA 60 Berg v R [2004] NSWCCA 300 Cf R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 Fahs v R [2007] NSWCCA 26 Licastro v R [2008] NSWCCA 131 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 CASES CITED : Murphy v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 412; 158 A Crim R 375 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Oliver (1982) 7 A Crim R 174 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 740 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Regina v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 Regina v Walker [2005] NSWCCA 109 Veen v The Queen (No2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Dennis TSAKONAS Regina
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate