NSW Caselaw
74 ACSR 531 75 NSWLR 745 Reported Decision : 236 FLR 288 [2010] ALMD 1454 4 BFRA 138 [2010] ALMD 1453
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : JSBG Developments Pty Ltd v Kozlowski [2009] NSWSC 1128
HEARING DATE(S) : 19/10/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Separate questions answered as per paragraph 31.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - proceedings brought by company - originating process signed by company's sole director - no solicitor involved - whether proceedings validly constituted - defendant resident in another State but served in New South Wales - whether compliance with Service and Execution of Process Act required
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 127(1)(c), 459G, 467A, 1322(2) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 79 LEGISLATION CITED : Service and Execution of Process Act 1992 (Cth), ss 15(1), 16 Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, rules 1.3(1)(a), 1.3(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rules 7.1, 7.2(1), 28.2
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Gordon v Tolcher [2006] HCA 62; (2006) 231 CLR 334 CASES CITED : Hubbard Association of Scientologists International v Anderson [1972] VR 340 Hubbard Association of Scientologists International v Anderson (No 2) [1972] VR 577
PARTIES : JSBG Developments Pty Ltd - Plaintiff Wlodzimierz Antoni Kozlowski - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4503/09
COUNSEL : Mr G D McDonald - Plaintiff Mr T O Bland - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate