NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Davis v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 258
HEARING DATE(S): 14/10/10
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Kirby J at 2; Hoeben J at 62
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - supply of prohibited drug ss 25(1) and 29 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - appeal against conviction - whether judge's comment suggested accused obliged to give evidence - possessin of drug the only issue - whether direction on inferences adequate - whether verdict unreasonable or unsupported by evidence.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Robinson v The Queen [1991] HCA 38; (1991) 180 CLR 531 CASES CITED : The Queen v Clarke (1995) 78 A Crim R 226 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487
PARTIES: Craig Campbell Davis (App) Regina (Resp/Crown)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/10281
COUNSEL: T Gartelmann (App) J A Girdham (Resp/Crown)
SOLICITORS: Ryan & Bosscher (App) S Kavanagh (Resp/Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Blackmore DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 25/2/10
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2009/10281
McCLELLAN CJ at CL KIRBY J HOEBEN J
Thursday 9 December 2010 Craig Campbell DAVIS v REGINA Judgment 1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: I agree with Kirby J. 2 KIRBY J: On 9 November 2009, Craig Campbell Davis (the appellant) was arraigned before Blackmore DCJ and a jury upon a charge that, on 26 February 2009, he supplied a prohibited drug, namely, 3, 4 ethylenedioxy methyl amphetamine, contrary to ss 25(1) and 29 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 ("the Act"). Mr Davis pleaded not guilty. After a short trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty at 10.09 am on 11 November 2009. 3 On 25 February 2010, the appellant was sentenced to imprisonment with a non parole period of 1 year and 1 month (11.11.09 to 10.12.10) and an additional term of 1 year 2 months to expire on 10.2.12 (taking account of a matter on a Form 1). The matter on the Form 1 was a small quantity of cannabis found in his home unit at the time of a search that I will shortly describe. 4 Mr Davis appeals against his conviction. There is no appeal against sentence. Before going to the Notice of Appeal, I should briefly describe the evidence at trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate