NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hewitt v Gardner; Hewitt v Gardner [2009] NSWSC 1107
HEARING DATE(S) : 13, 14, 15 and 29 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 16 October 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J
DECISION : In 2693/07 Orders for provision made in respect of three of the plaintiffs. In 2046/08 Declare that the defendant holds property on trust for the estate. Order property to be reconveyed.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - general principles - undue influence and duress - deceased transferred home to defendant for consideration of one dollar - defendant the daughter and primary carer for deceased - whether relationship between deceased and defendant gave rise to presumption of undue influence - whether presumption rebutted - held that relationship gave rise to presumption of undue influence - presumption not rebutted - SUCCESSION - family provision and maintenance - deceased left will and codicil giving lifetime occupation right and residue of estate to one of eight adult children - claims for provision made by remaining seven children - whether inadequate provision made for some or all plaintiffs - held that inadequate provision made for three of plaintiffs - relief granted
Family Provision Act 1982 LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Real Property Act 1900
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Aboody [1990] 1 QB 23 Barkley v Barkley-Brown [2009] NSWSC 76 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Breen v Williams (1995-6) 186 CLR 71 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 Collings v Vakas [2006] NSWSC 393 Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Amadio (1993) 151 CLR 447 Hewitt v Gardner; Hewitt & Gardner [2009] NSWSC 705 Hospital Products Ltd v United Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 Huguenin v Baseley (1807) 14 Ves Jun Supp 273 Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 Johnson v Johnson [2009] NSWSC 503 Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 61 CASES CITED : McDougall v Rogers; Estate of James Rogers [2006] NSWSC 484 Morrison v Coast Finance Limited (1965) 55 DLR (2d) 6710 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 Palmer v Dolman, Dolman v Palmer [2005] NSWCA 361 Poosathurai v Kanappa Chettiar (1919) LR 47 Ind App 1 Re Birtchnell (1929) 42 CLR 384 Riz v Perpetual Trustee Australia Limited [2007] NSWSC 1153 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Stivactas v Michaletos (No 2) [1994] ANZ ConvR 252 Turner v Windever [2003] NSWSC 1147 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker (NSWSC, 17 May 1996, unreported) Watkins v Combes (1922) 30 CLR 180 Whereat v Duff [1972] 2 NSWLR 147 Winefield v Clarke [2008] NSWSC 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate