NSW Caselaw
[2009] ALMD 5385 27 ACLC 522 71 ACSR 368 Reported Decision : 256 ALR 199 230 FLR 1 256 ALR 199 230 FLR 1
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287
HEARING DATE(S) : 29, 30 September 2008; 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28 October 2008; 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Nov 2008; 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 December 2008; 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 February 2009; 2 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
DECISION : See summary at [1269] and following.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - Supervision, Regulation and Correction - Civil penalty proceedings - Whether announcement to the ASX approved at directors' meeting - Whether minute to that effect subject to statutory presumption under s 251A or s 1305 of the Corporations Law - Whether false or misleading - Whether directors and senior executives acted in breach of s 180(1) of the Corporations Law - Whether in failing to disclose information with respect to a deed of covenant and indemnity (DOCI) there was a breach of Listing Rule 3.1 and s 1001A(2) of the Corporations Law - Whether the directors who executed the DOCI were in breach of s 180(1) - Whether the chief executive officer approved the release of the ASX Announcement and breached s 180(1) - Whether the company breached s 995(2) of the Corporations Law - Whether the company breached s 999 of the Corporations Law - Whether the CEO was in breach of s 180(1) for statements made at a press conference - Whether he was he breach of s 181 of the Corporations Law - Whether the company was in breach of s 995(2) and s 999 - Whether there were breaches of s 180(1), s 181, s995(2) and s 999 for statements made in two subsequent ASX Announcements - Whether the directors were in breach of s 180(1) of the Corporations Act in approving a draft information memorandum to be used in a members' scheme of arrangement - Whether the CEO and secretary and general counsel were in breach of s 180(1) in approving the draft IM and authorising a letter to be sent to the Court - Whether the company was in breach of s 995(2) and s 999 of the Corporations Act - Whether the CEO was in breach of s 180(1) and s 181 of the Corporations Act for statements made in United Kingdom and slides lodged with the ASX - Whether the company was in breach of s 1041E and s 1041H of the Corporations Act - Whether the company was in breach of Listing Rule 3.1 and s 674(2) of the Corporations Act for failing to disclose a restructure of the James Hardie group
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate