NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Daley [2010] NSWCCA 223
HEARING DATE(S): 10 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Price J at 2; Fullerton J at 66
DECISION: 1.The Crown appeal against sentence be upheld. 2.The sentence imposed in the District Court on 28 April 2010 be quashed. 3.The conviction is confirmed. 4.The respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years 6 months commencing on 18 November 2010 and expiring on 17 May 2014 with a balance of term of 1 year 6 months commencing on 18 May 2014 and expiring on 17 November 2015. The earliest date on which the respondent will be eligible for release to parole is 17 May 2014.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - sexual intercourse without consent - whether actual or threatened violence an element of the offence - whether young prison inmate vulnerable - whether non-conclusive finding on future prospects of rehabilitation available - consideration of relevance of duration of offence - whether structure of sentence reflected overall criminality - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - Crown appeal upheld
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5D Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 s 68A LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 61I, s 61L, s 61J(2), s 61J(2)(a), s 61J(2)(b), Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act s 21A, s 21A(2), s 21A(2)(b), s 21A(2)(I), s 21A(4)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Doolan v R (2006) 160 A Crim R 54 House v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 499 Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Gebrail (Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 November 1994, unreported) CASES CITED : R v Hibberd (2009) 194 A Crim R 1 RJS v R (1993) 31 NSWLR 649 R v Johnson [2005] NSWCCA 186 R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 140 R v King [2009] NSWCCA 117 R v Lardner (Court of Criminal Appeal, 10 September 1998, unreported) R v M.A.K; R v M.S.K [2006] NSWCCA 381 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Tadrosse (2006) 65 NSWLR 740 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate