NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 71 ACSR 577
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Limited [2009] NSWSC 321
HEARING DATE(S) : 24/04/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Time for service extended
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - time for service of initiating process - application for extension - several earlier extensions - whether plaintiff has shown good reason to extend - whether relevant prejudice to defendants - appropriateness of ex parte application confirmed - need for direction that defendant be informed of rights under the rules questioned - extension granted
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 588FF(1), 588FF(3) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rules 1.1(2), 6.2(4)(a), 12.11(1)(e), 12.11(2)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Hoddinott v Persimmon Homes [2008] 1 WLR 806 Mason v First Leisure Corporation Plc [2003] EWHC 1814 (QB) Onefone Australia Pty Ltd v One.Tel Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1320 CASES CITED : Rich v Long [2008] NSWSC 487 Simpson v Saskatchewan Government Insurance Office (1967) 65 DLR (2d) 324 Van Leer Australia Pty Ltd v Palace Shipping KK (1981) 55 ALJR 243 Verdich v McKechnie [1981] TasR 91 Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1318
Paul Gerard Weston in his capacity as special purpose liquidator of One.Tel Limited - Plaintiff Publishing and Broadcasting Limited - First Defendant Consolidated Press Holdings Limited - Second Defendant Robbdoc Pty Limited - Third Defendant Toranaga Pty Limited - Fourth Defendant Cavalane Holdings Pty Limited - Fifth Defendant News Limited - Sixth Defendant Leteno Pty Limited - Seventh Defendant James Douglas Packer - Eighth Defendant PARTIES : Peter Wilson Yates - Ninth Defendant Lachlan Keith Murdoch - Tenth Defendant Peter John Macourt - Eleventh Defendant Kevin Beck - Twelfth Defendant Mark Alan Silbermann - Thirteenth Defendant Peter David Howell-Davies - Fourteenth Defendant Pirjo Hannele Kekalainen-Torvinen - Fifteenth Defendant Persons named in Schedule A trading as Freehills who are named in Schedule A to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 - Sixteenth Defendant Persons named in Schedule B trading as Ernst & Young who are named in Schedule B to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 Persons named in Schedule C trading as Ferrier Hodgson who are named in Schedule C to the Statement of Claim filed on 25 May 2007 - Eighteenth Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate