NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Leybourne v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2010] NSWCA 78
HEARING DATE(S): 9 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 April 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA; Tobias JA; Sackville AJA
DECISION: (1) Appeal dismissed with costs. (2) Discharge the stay granted on 25 May 2009.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT - loan agreement - pre-contractual statement under Credit Code - part of offer - offer accepted - deed not necessary - addition of "per" to lender's signature - not material change - Real Property Act ss 36(10)(a), 36(11), 51A - Conveyancing Act ss 23C, 38 not relevant - intention to create legal relations manifested - agreement binding - no question of principle. MORTGAGE - signed by solicitor for mortgagee to certify correctness of dealing - solicitor's name substituted - not material alteration - mortgage secured an enforceable loan agreement - memorandum validly incorporated - no question of principle. PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS - application for adjournment in order to apply to consolidate with other proceedings - application for adjournment due to late production of evidence - leave to apply again if prejudice shown - no procedural unfairness - solicitor appearing for himself - not to be treated as unrepresented litigant. EVIDENCE - Evidence Act ss 135, 136 - no unfair prejudice - no error shown. AGENCY - authority to sign for lender - on facts, was authority - in any event, ratification established - not necessary for ratification to know particular act of agency.
Armor Coatings (Marketing) Pty Ltd v General Credits (Finance) Pty Ltd (1978) 17 SASR 259; Australian Blue Metal Ltd v Hughes (1961) 79 WN (NSW) 498; Bakerland Pty Ltd v Coleridge [2002] NSWCA 30; Bremner v Sinclair NSWCA, 3 November 1998; (2001) ANZ Conv R 29; Brockway v Pando [2000] WASCA 192; Eastern Construction Co Ltd v National Trust Co Ltd (1914) AC 197; Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Slade & Anor (1996) 38 NSWLR 636; Galvin v R [2006] NSWCCA 66; (2006) 161 A Crim R 449; Iannello v Sharpe [2007] NSWCA 61; (2007) 69 NSWLR 452; CASES CITED: Jones v Peters (1948) VLR 331; Longhurst v Hunt [2004] NSWCCA 193; (2002) 130 A Crim R 256; Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas [2004] HCA 35; (2004) 208 ALR 213; Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 186 CLR 297; Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v English [2010] NSWCA 32; Petersen v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91; Pigot's case (1614) 11 Co Rep 26b; 77 ER 1177; Provident Capital Limited v Printy [2008] NSWCA 131; 13 BPR 25,199; R v Suteski [2002] NSWCCA 509; (2002) 56 NSWLR 182; Union Bank of Australia Ltd v McClintock (1922) 1 AC 240; [2006] NSWSC 1028; Warburton v National Westminster Finance Australia Ltd (1988) 15 NSWLR 238.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate