NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ICAP Pty Ltd & Ors v Moebes & Anor [2009] NSWSC 306
HEARING DATE(S) : 30.03.09
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Nicholas J
DECISION : Par 51
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - SUBPOENA - whether legitimate forensic purpose or "fishing" - general principles considered - whether subpoena should be set aside
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Air Canada v Secretary for State for Trade [1983] 2 AC 394 Alister v The Queen [1984] HCA 85; (1984) 154 CLR 404 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Stuart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 CASES CITED : Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1997] FCA 1504; (1997) 37 ATR 432 NSW Commissioner of Police v Tuxford & Ors [2002] NSWCA 139 Portal Software v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1115 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (No. 2) (1989) 21 FCR 306; (1989) 88 ALR 90 Travel Compensation Fund v Blair & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1228
ICAP Pty Ltd – first plaintiff ICAP (Futures) Australia Pty Ltd – second plaintiff PARTIES : ICAP Brokers Pty Ltd - third plaintiff Forrest Moebes – first defendant Kellee Campbell – second defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5947/07
P D Doyle Gray - BGC Partners (Australia) Pty Ltd - applicant COUNSEL : J Stevenson SC/Ms C Spruce - plaintiffs/respondents no appearance - defendants
Horton Rhodes - applicant Minter Ellison - plaintiffs/respondents SOLICITORS : no appearance - defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate