NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Liddle v Twohig [2008] NSWSC 95
HEARING DATE(S) : 13-16, 20-22 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE : 19 February 2008
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hislop J
DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,837,500 plus costs.
CATCHWORDS : TORT - personal injury - motor vehicle accident - conflicting liability evidence.
CASES CITED : Podrebeserk v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALJR 492
PARTIES : Matthew Liddle (Plaintiff) Michael Andrew Twohig (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20416/04
COUNSEL : K.P. Rewell SC/M.A. Cleary (Plaintiff) I.D. Roberts SC (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Stacks - The Law Firm (Plaintiff) Moray and Agnew (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HISLOP J
Tuesday 19 February 2008
20416/04 MATTHEW LIDDLE v MICHAEL ANDREW TWOHIG
JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 The plaintiff suffered serious injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred at approximately 6.50 pm on 1 December 2002. The accident occurred at the intersection of Sutherland and Kethel Roads, Cheltenham, New South Wales, when the plaintiff's Kawasaki ZZR 250 cc motorcycle collided with the defendant's manual Mazda 323 sedan. 2 The plaintiff alleges the accident and his resultant injuries were caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant has denied liability and alleges the plaintiff's injuries were caused or contributed to by the plaintiff's own negligence. 3 There were no witnesses to the accident and there is a conflict between the parties as to what occurred. The damages recoverable in the event the plaintiff is wholly successful in his action have been agreed between the parties. The issues for the determination of the Court are liability and, if necessary, contributory negligence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate