NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: ST v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 5
HEARING DATE(S): 13/11/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 February 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Howie J at 23; Hislop J at 61
DECISION: Appeal is allowed, the convictions quashed and that there be a retrial of the counts in the indictment.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - criminal - conviction - failure to give Longman warning - verdict unreasonable - powers of court on appeal - whether new trial appropriate - CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - procedure - summing up - failure to give Longman warning - whether miscarriage of justice - CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - whether verdict unreasonable or unsupportable having regard to evidence
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - ss 6, 7, 8 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - s 294 Criminal Procedure Amendment (Sexual and other Offences) Act 2006
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
King v The Queen [1986] HCA 59; 161 CLR 423 Spies v the Queen [2000] HCA 43; 201 CLR 603 Gerakiteys v The Queen [1984] HCA 8; 153 CLR 317 Regina v Pedrana [2001] NSWCCA 66; 123 A Crim R 1 Andrews v The Queen [1968] HCA 84; 126 CLR 198 Director of Public Prosecutions (Nauru) v Fowler [1984] HCA 48; 154 CLR 627 CASES CITED : Peacock v The King [1911] HCA 66; 13 CLR 619 The Queen v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; 228 CLR 232 Everett v The Queen [1994] HCA 49; 181 CLR 295 Longman v The Queen [1989] HCA 60; 168 CLR 79 TJ v R [2009] NSWCCA 257 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 R v RND [1999] NSWCCA 122
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate