NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hillsan Pty Limited v Vaccaro and Anor [2009] NSWSC 435
HEARING DATE(S) : 21 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt AJ
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - New South Wales - notice of motion - application to strike out defence to the amended statement of claim - mortgage property - allegations of fraud - motion dismissed - orders requiring filing of amended defence and cross claim made - costs
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1995) 57 FCR 360 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] AC 176 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED : Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Heuvel [2009] NSWSC 57 Steele-Smith v Liberty Financial Pty Limited [2005] NSWSC 398 Waimiha Sawmilling Co Ltd v Waione Timber Co Ltd [1923] NZLR 1137 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534
Plaintiff/Cross Defendant - Hillsan Pty Limited (ACN 063 926 367) PARTIES : First Defendant/First Cross Claimant - Federico Vaccaro Second Defendant/Second Cross Claimant - Maria Vaccaro
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 14742/06
COUNSEL : Plaintiff/Cross Defendant - Ms J Merkel, counsel Defendants/Cross Claimants - Mr P Beale, counsel
SOLICITORS : Plaintiff/Cross Defendant - Hancocks Defendants/Cross Claimants - McGrath, Dicembre & Company
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate