NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Calvo v Sweeney [2009] NSWSC 719
HEARING DATE(S) : 09-13 February 2009; 16-18 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 July 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : White J
DECISION : Refer to para 275 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - general principles - fiduciary obligations – defendant retained as plaintiffs' adviser to find purchasers for plaintiffs' shares or to raise capital for company to repay plaintiffs' loan – defendant obtained control of company and procured the issue of a substantial shareholding to himself for no consideration - dependence and vulnerability to exercise of influence – relationship of confidence - conflict between interest and duty – appropriateness of enquiry into fairness of transaction – undue influence - no presumption of undue influence – actual influence - EQUITY – equitable remedies – constructive trusts - EQUITY – equitable defences – acquiescence and laches - EQUITY – equitable relief – whether equitable relief should be conditional on making of just allowance for time spent on company's affairs or donations to company
Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Higher Education Act 2001 (NSW) Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75; (1985) 157 CLR 215 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation [1984] HCA 64; (1984) 156 CLR 41 Breen v Williams [1996] HCA 57; (1996) 186 CLR 71 Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 Chan v Zacharia (1984) 154 CLR 178 Brunninghausen v Glavanics [1999] NSWCA 199; (1999) 46 NSWLR 538 Coleman v Myers [1977] 2 NZLR 225 Tate v Williamson (1866) LR2ChApp 55 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [1999] FCA 1798 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 963; (2007) 160 FCR 35 Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange Ltd [1986] HCA 25; (1986) 160 CLR 371 McEvilly v Manenti Quinlan & Associates Pty Ltd (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Einstein J, 10 August 1998, unreported) Holder v Holder [1968] Ch 353 CASES CITED : Re One.Tel Networks Holdings Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 1065; 40 ACSR 83 Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros [1843-60] All ER Rep 249 McPherson v Watt (1877) 3 App Cas 254 Daly v Sydney Stock Exchange (1986) 160 CLR 371 Clay v Clay [2001] HCA 9; (2001) 202 CLR 410 In re Thompson's Settlement [1986] Ch 99 People's Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Australian Federal Life and General Assurance Co Ltd (1935) 35 SR (NSW) 253 Chellew v Excell [2009] 1 NZLR 711 Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 Orr v Ford [1989] HCA 4; (1989) 167 CLR 316 Lindsay Petroleum Company v Hurd (1873-74) LR 5 PC 221 Clegg v Edmondson (1857) 8 De GM & G 787 Re Jarvis (decd); Edge v Jarvis [1958] 2 All ER 336 Warman International Ltd v Dwyer [1995] HCA 18; (1995) 182 CLR 544 Phipps v Boardman [1965] Ch 992 Green & Clara Pty Ltd v Bestobell Industries Pty Ltd (No. 2) [1984] WAR 32 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10; (2003) 56 NSWLR 298
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate