NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lucantonio v Kleinert [2009] NSWSC 929
HEARING DATE(S) : 5 August 2009 JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 5 August 2009
DECISION : Tender of expert evidence refused
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE – expert evidence – where plaintiff seeks to tender report of an additional expert after other expert witnesses have been involved in conclave and have produced joint report – where additional expert was not involved in conclave – held: to allow plaintiff to tender report would frustrate purpose of Court's management of expert evidence
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Dean Lucantonio as trustee for the Lucantonio Family Trust (plaintiff) PARTIES : Jaime Kleinert (first defendant/XC1 first cross-defendant/XC2 cross-claimant) Otto Stichter (second defendant/XC1 cross-claimant/XC2 first cross-defendant) Darryl Leslie Warren (third defendant/XC1 second cross-defendant/XC2 second cross-defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20351/04
Mr G Laughton SC w Ms D Christofis (plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr R Darke SC (first defendant) Mr G Curtin (second defendant) Mr M Ashhurst SC (third defendant)
Gells Lawyers (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Kennedys Lawyers (first defendant) DLA Phillips Fox Lawyers (second defendant) McCabe Terrill Lawyers (third defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BRERETON J
Wednesday 5 August 2009
20351/04 Dean Lucantonio as Trustee for Lucantonio Family Trust & 2 Ors v Jaime Kleinert & 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate