NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Limit (No 3) Limited v ACE Insurance Limited (No 4) [2009] NSWSC 1046
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 September 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Rein J
DECISION : Leave granted to the plaintiffs to reopen on Issue 22 and the attribution point.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – application for leave to reopen – general principles – whether or not the plaintiff had been heard on the applicability of a reasonable precautions condition and professional services exclusion to Section 2 cover
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Cavasinni v Cavasinni (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 957 CASES CITED : McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1814 OzEcom Ltd (in liq) v Hudson Investments Group Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1441 Wentworth v Rogers [2002] NSWSC 921 Wentworth v Wentworth [1999] NSWSC 638
Limit (No 3) Limited (First plaintiff) Oak Dedicated Limited (Second plaintiff) PARTIES : The Underwriter Insurance Company Limited (Third plaintiff) GE Frankona Reinsurance Limited (Fourth plaintiff) ACE Insurance Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50191/05
COUNSEL : Mr S Donaldson SC, Mr J Neal (Plaintiffs) Mr J Simpkins SC, Mr T W Marskell (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Deacons (Plaintiffs) Wotton & Kearney (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Rein J
Date of Hearing: 8 September 2009 Date of Judgment: 30 September 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate