NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Barker [2009] NSWCCA 225
HEARING DATE(S): 25 August 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; RA Hulme J at 58; Davies J at 59
DECISION: Crown appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal - objective seriousness - sentence manifestly inadequate - residual discretion dismissing the appeal
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Firearms Act 1996 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
MLP v R (2006) 164 a Crim R 93 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Deng Mading Deng (2007) 176 A Crim R 1 R v Hansel [2004] NSWCCA 436 CASES CITED : R v Jenkins [2006] NSWCCA 412 R v Tory and Tory [2006] NSWCCA 18 R v Todorovic [2008] NSWCCA 49 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Yang [2002] NSWCCA 464; 135 A Crim R 237
PARTIES: The Crown (applicant) William Barker (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/3017
COUNSEL: M M Cinque (Crown/applicant) A C Haesler SC (respondent)
SOLICITORS: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown/applicant) Legal Aid Commission of NSW (respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/3017
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Nicholson DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 23 June 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2009/3017
McCLELLAN CJ at CL R A HULME J DAVIES J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate